MORGANTOWN, W.Va. – Dana Holgorsen called it a game “we should have won” and some of his players mistakenly felt they already had.

After transforming an early 13-point deficit into an 11-point third-quarter lead, West Virginia celebrated too soon. And No. 16 Texas Tech responded with closing surge of its own, reeling off the final 21 points in a 37-27 win.

“We thought we had this game,” said receiver Kevin White. “But we didn’t keep the gas on them. We just let off a little bit, and you can’t do that in the Big 12. Those (Texas Tech) guys were good, but I thought we were better.”

Our unit-by-unit evaluation of Saturday’s loss, which dropped the Mountaineers to 3-4 overall and 1-3 in league play:

Ben Queen/MetroNews photo

Clint Trickett and the WVU offense produce zero points on its final five series.

 

QUARTERBACK
The most apparent sign Clint Trickett has a better grasp of “putting the ball in play” was his willingness to make more underneath throws. A 41-percent passer coming in, he connected on 27-of-43 for 254 yards and made a sharp read to find Charles Sims on a short TD.
Three times, however, Trickett missed open receivers, including a third-and-4 pass he threw low and left of Ronald Carswell at the marker. That misfire came amid WVU’s string of five fruitless possessions that closed the game.
“When times mattered most, we didn’t play situations as good as we should have—me included,” Trickett said.
RUNNING BACKS
Dreamius Smith compiled a career-high 89 yards on 16 carries, showing exceptional vision and cutback ability on scoring runs of 38 and 12 yards.
The junior college transfer’s 5.6 yards per carry was a tick better than the 5.1 of Charles Sims, whose 77-yard day was tempered by his second lost fumble of the season. Sims popped a 16-yard run from his own 1 that was a shoestring tackle away from being a 99-yarder. (Cody Clay’s seal block on the edge sprang it.)
Continuing to be utilized in the passing game, Sims made seven receptions for 32 yards, including a 4-yard touchdown on a sideline catch after going in motion.
Third-string freshman Wendell Smallwood did not have a carry but turned his only catch into a 13-yard gain. Clay also had a 9-yard grab, his seventh of the season.

Ben Queen/Metronews photo

Daikiel Shorts (6) celebrates a score with Charles Sims. The pair combined for 16 catches in the 37-27 loss to Texas Tech.

 

RECEIVERS
White’s five-catch 77-yard game warrants an asterisk, considering he drew three 15-yard pass interference flags against Tech’s Olaoluwa Falemi and a holding call against Bruce Jones. His 40-yard leaping reception over 5-foot-10 safety Tanner Jacobson was a key play on WVU’s 99-yard second-quarter scoring drive.
The highest-degree-of-difficulty catch went to Daikiel Shorts, who wrestled down a 22-yard jump ball over Terrance Bullitt. Though Shorts made nine grabs for 78 yards, he also inappropriately broke off a corner route on the infamous fourth-and-14 incompletion (see coaching).
Targeted only three times, Carswell had a single catch for 18 yards. In the fourth quarter, he missed a crucial block on a quick-screen to Shorts that went for no gain.
Mario Alford, after moving from slot to outside receiver, caught one pass on a 15-yard slant and was targeted once more on a deep sideline incompletion into the end zone. He also ran an end around for minus-2 yards as WVU futilely tried to get off the deck in the fourth quarter.
Jordan Thompson (two catches for 12 yards) had a drop in the closing seconds.
OFFENSIVE LINE
After Texas Tech allowed 3.1 yards per rush through six games, WVU averaged 4.7. But the line’s most productive performance of the season took a nosedive after left guard Quinton Spain left with an apparent right leg injury at 1:31 of the third quarter.
“We scared them early, and we were doing things downfield early, so they kept the safeties back a lot in the second half,” Holgorsen said. “We were unable to block man-on-man in the last quarter and a half, which is discouraging, disheartening.”
Asked if Spain’s absence explained the late-game struggles (9 yards on the final six carries), Holgorsen replied: “Probably, but suck it up.”
WVU allowed two sacks, including one in the fourth quarter when left tackle Nick Kindler was beaten off edge by sophomore linebacker Pete Robertson, result in in a Trickett fumble and a 7-yard loss.
WVU wasted a scoring threat early, facing second-and-5 at the Texas Tech 15, when Pat Eger committed a personal foul coming to the aid of Thompson (who was being stood up and popped by defenders). Two plays later, Mark Glowinski hooked a defender on a trap block and drew a holding penalty. That all set up the fourth-and-14 scenario from the 26 (really, see coaching).
DEFENSIVE LINE
Texas Tech’s 3.6 yards per carry was nominal, and right on pace with its season average. But during the final 4:43, when trying to construct a game-clinching drive, Tech ran four straight times for 31 yards and two crucial first downs.
But the real shortcoming Saturday was WVU’s lack of a pass rush—a responsibility the defensive front shares with the linebackers. On 52 drop-backs, Red Raiders freshman Davis Webb was never sacked and was hurried only six times (liberal application of the term “hurry”). Four of those hurries still resulted in positive yardage: twice Webb tucked it for short gains, twice he completed throws.
Davis, making his second start in place of the injured Baker Mayfield, threw for 462 yards on 36-of 50 passing. The kid looked less like a second-team rookie and more like Seth Doege reincarnated.
“I just can’t believe the efficiency in which that kid throws the ball,” said WVU defensive coordinator Keith Patterson. “It’s like the guy has been starting since Aug. 1.
“Every time we tried to zone pressure it seemed like they had the perfect call. He understands what he wants to do with the ball. There’s no hesitation. When his reads aren’t there, he pulls it down and runs.”
Dontrill Hyman and Shaq Rowell (three tackles each) weren’t disruptive enough, and Will Clarke was invisible, held without a tackle until the final three minutes. Kyle Rose made two stops in a backup role.
LINEBACKERS
Nick Kwiatkoski, the unit’s most dynamic playmaker this season, returned from a two-game absence (hamstring) to make eight tackles. He was just inches shy from making two stops on Texas Tech touchdowns.
His diving-over-the-pile hit stopped Kenny Williams cold in the third quarter (though refs ruled the tip of the ball crossed the goal line). The converted high school safety then was unable to cover tight end Jace Amaro on a 10-yard TD pass with 61 seconds left.
“Nick was in good position, had inside leverage on the coverage, and (Webb) just kind of tubed it inside,” said Patterson. “The ball’s right there on the money.”
Amaro caught a much easier touchdown in the first period when Buck linebacker Brandon Golson left him uncovered on third-and-3 from the 10. The linebackers and safeties were unable to inhibit Amaro, who compiled a nine-catch, 136-yard day.
Jared Barber made a team-high nine tackles, 1.5 TFLs and deflected a third-down pass, while Doug Rigg added five stops and Golson four. Isaiah Bruce made only two tackles, but his third-down pressure forced an incompletion that held the Raiders to a first-quarter field goal. Bruce later made the WVU defensive play of the day—granted, there weren’t many candidates—by forcing and recovering a Webb goal-line fumble that prevented the game from becoming a runaway with Tech leading 13-3 in the second period.

Joe Sadlek/All-Pro Photography

Kenny Williams ran for 58 yards and two TDs on 16 carries for Texas Tech.

 

SECONDARY
Not nearly so balanced as Baylor, Texas Tech asked its quarterback to win the game and Webb delivered in his first collegiate road start. Having surrendered 858 passing yards in its past two games, WVU ranks next to last in the conference in passing defense (257 yards per game) and last in yards per attempt (8.1).
Freshman Daryl Worley, elevated to starter over Travis Bell at field cornerback, had his hands full matched up against Bradley Marquez (eight catches for 112 yards). For the most part, Worley was fundamentally sound, except for a 30-yard first-quarter completion on which he rolled up toward the line and let Marquez get free deep.
Worley, WVU’s most physically imposing corner, also was blocked into infinity by Tech freshman receiver Reginald Davis on a 27-yard catch-and-run by DeAndre Washington.
Bell played frequently as a backup and had his own struggles against Marquez and Eric Ward.
Karl Joseph (five tackles) was the victim of a well designed third-and-1 playcall on which Williams faked a left-side dive and caught a short pass that went for 41 yards.
Darwin Cook (seven tackles) warranted and received a 15-yard flag for a late hit against Amaro on an overthrown pass.
After K.J. Dillon let Amaro run free for a 24-yarder, the nickel back played solid coverage to no avail on a 32-yard completion.
Seldom-used corner Avery Williams was victimized by slot receiver Jordan Davis on a 27-yard catch that led to Tech’s game-sealing score.

Ben Queen/MetroNews photo

WVU’s Terrell Chestnut forces a Texas Tech fumble on a first-half kick return.

 

SPECIAL TEAMS
During West Virginia’s midgame surge, Terrell Chestnut stripped Tech’s Austin Stewart on a kick return and Brandon Napoleon recovered at the Red Raiders’ 15. That set up a field goal that squared the game at 13-all.
WVU later allowed a 52-yard kick return by Reginald Davis, while its own runbacks were underwhelming at 17 yards per.
Nick O’Toole’s 42.6-yard punting average included a long off 55 and two inside the 20. He didn’t provide his typical hang time, but Tech managed essentially nothing two returns and WVU continues to top the Big 12 in net punting (42.0).
Josh Lambert made both field-goal attempts, from 33 and 30 yards respectively, and should have attempted a 43-yarder in the first quarter if not for the most nonsensical fourth-down gamble of Holgorsen’s career..
COACHING
Let’s address the obvious question: What in the name of Charlie Weis was Holgorsen thinking on fourth-and-14 from the Texas Tech 26? WVU trailed only 10-0 with one minute left in the first quarter. Hardly the time to panic. After Trickett floated a 30-yard spiral to an empty corner of the end zone, the entire stadium was asking “Whaaaaaaaat?”
Holgorsen later admitted, “I do regret that decision. I should’ve kicked it.” Still, such a low-percentage play demands deeper explanation. And Holgorsen’s explanation only made the decision murkier.
“I just saw (Texas Tech) take it right down and score two times in a row, so I figured that touchdowns were going to be important,” Holgorsen said. He apparently missed the part where Tech had deemed a field goal plenty important by taking one on fourth-and-goal at the 4.
“We should have kicked the field goal,” Holgorsen reiterated, “but it was fourth-and-2, or whatever it was, and we were moving the ball good.”
Whatever it was most certainly was not fourth-and-2, but rather fourth-and-14. Quite a difference there. Perhaps Holgorsen merely had a press conference slip of the tongue—as opposed to actually misjudging down-and-distance by such a ridiculous gap—but the resulting loss of three points was careless and certainly impacted the game late. (Recall that Texas Tech was leading by three when it put away the game with a late TD drive. Would the Red Raiders have been so confident in a tie-game situation? Would WVU’s last series have proceeded differently if the score was still a one-possession margin?)
Beyond the unfathomable fourth-down decision, Holgorsen and his staff also suffered a big-picture fail: Their inability to keep players level-headed and focused when they were rolling in the second half. WVU’s mindset shifted to cruise-control and Texas Tech regained momentum.
“We started feeling pretty good about ourselves in the middle of the third quarter, but the game wasn’t over,” Holgorsen admitted. Given the full-scale demolitions at Maryland and Baylor, how could WVU could fall susceptible to overconfidence against an unbeaten Top 25 team?
It was a lethal lapse. When Texas Tech counterpunched, West Virginia caved, showing yet again that a rebuilding team with a Proustian list of flaws may not be worthy of a 13th game this season.

Ben Queen/Metronews photo

Dana Holgorsen watched WVU squander a chance to upset Texas Tech.
bubble graphic

76

bubble graphic

Comments

  • Vicky

    My comment does not have anything to do with this specific game. However, week in and week out I am irritated by the fact that Dana Holgerson wears black instead of the blue & gold. Our colors are NOT black and the blue and gold are worn with pride. He has not won the right to dress in other colors. I do not actually know who he answers to but it should be mandatory that he wear our BLUE & GOLD

  • Moon

    Special Teams Note: The next time WVU should return a kick that goes into the end zone is NEVER!!!

  • fox

    If we are going to get better, it better come soon.

  • jerry

    everyone on here wants a quick fix fire dana
    get tressel he is a has been . stewart caused all this mess couldnt recruit you guys dont see the big picture were a young team were going to get there plus stewart about lost to marshall
    coach rod had 2 losing seasons before he turned it around . hang in there i see a big turn around coming .

  • Paul

    Kevin White should have had two touchdowns, all coach needed to call was a double move with a fake and he would have been wide open for a touchdown. Why don't we throw to Cody more he is now 4 of 5 for the year with 4 first downs. His one miss Saturday was a clear hold. With the great running game in the first half why didn't we run some play action. I am impressed at the way Tricket ran on several broken plays we need that. We should have won easily, very disappointing.

  • JL

    Anyone hear Holgorsen's f-bomb on the post-game show? What an unprofessional tool. Thanks Ollie!

  • John

    Alan I don't know what is worse Holgorsen's 4th and 14 call which he thought was 4th and 2 or guy like you, who are in the pressroom, and DO NOT CORRECT HIM and say coach it was 4th and 14 what were you thinking? Does the WV Press get paid to ask questions that are difficult? Or are you supposed to allow Holgs a pass for his crucial mistake.

    The WEST VIRGINIA PRESS GRADE=F

    • William

      You are so RIGHT John - We will wait to see what Mr.Taylor has to say
      What is the toughest question Allan Taylor has EVER asked this coach?
      I can't think of ANY, maybe he can let us know what his toughest question he has asked this season?
      Allan, I have one you can asked -
      Holgorsen do you own any blue and gold shirts?

  • Jeff

    Holgorson has lost the team. They have no respect for him. You can see it in the lack of blocking, lack of effort on special teams and lack of hustle period. Lets get a coach with some experience in here that can manage a game. This "offensive guru" has no place at WVU.

  • Jima.

    ......Luck needs to go straight to where Dana should go......We Mountaineers needs some good home grown talent...Bill Stewart where are you?

    • Bryan

      I respect the fact we have forums such as these to express our opinions however if you really don't know where coach Stewart then you apparently shouldn't be on here spouting off. R.I.P. Coach Stewart you were a great man and a great West Virginian.

  • Bryan

    Holgorsen should be fired, didn't live up to the preseason predictions of the fans. Instead he has followed the path of the experts and is currently sitting just where the experts predicated with the exception of one upset. So never mind the experts fans know best and we should 12-0 every year or make a change in staff every year.

  • Big Larry

    The Holgorsen Relatives and paid trolls are seeming absent from this forum today. Not to mention all the Kool-Aid drinkers who were predicting an upset.

    But just be patient. On Tuesday they start filtering back in unnoticed and by Thursday they are back in full force predicting victories and talking about how great Oliver Luck and Holgorsen are...

    It is what it is

  • big tom

    stew would never have done anygood in the big 12, so let's just forget that now and forever

    now, our competition level is much higher, week in and week out than the big least.

    this won't be a cake walk, getting up to speed...if ever.

    we need to forget recruiting in texas, that's crazy,,, we have a track record in Maryland, florida, ohio ,and pa,,, let's concentrate on those areas.
    and , let's keep holgie out of the recruiting,, he recruited millard and childress, both flunkies.
    if someone else does the recruiting , we're fine, not holgie..It's gonna take yrs to match up with texas, okla, Baylor etc. we just don't have the recruiting base, as they do...we will be a mid pack team for the most part, so get used to it,,, the greatest coach on earth needs talent,, wvu just can't get that much talent.

  • Josh

    WVU cannot keep using the "we're really a Big East team" playing in the Big 12 mentality when they get beat & think that's okay. You're either a Big East (or whatever it is now) or you're a Big 12 team. And if you're a Big 12 team, then this isn't acceptable. Dana & his staff are making good money to put a winning product on the field.

  • Shawn H

    I'm still wondering why we did not try to punch it in the end zone when we got that turnover right before halftime. We were already in comfortable FG range, so why not throw into the end zone? I realize you don't want an INT in that situation, but at least try a couple of throws.

    • Big Larry

      I'll tell you why...

      No confidence in Holgorsen's "Air Afraid" offense.

  • Joe

    While in the Big East and as an Eastern independent, we saw seaons in which we defeated the SEC, Big 12 champs and ACC runner-up in the Sugar, Fiesta and Orange Bowls, respectively. We also had a pergect season and plated Notre Dame in the Fiesta Bowl for the national championship.

    I do not accept the argument that now we are a member of the Big 12 this coaching, recruiting and performance level is now ok and expected.

    • Bryan

      When these statements like yours are made they are only looking at a few years in a long history, check the won-loss year by year and we have had plenty mediocre seasons. This is a typical swing in our history, up, middle, down, middle and up again. You can't let the phrase "win championships" be so controlling, of course we would all like to get there but in reality it is quite hard especially when there's not enough recruits in your own yard and you have to try a pick up the best you can from leftovers after the big boys get the stars. Sure we have scored a few gems that were overlooked or developed better than projected but that's not the norm and makes it hard to compete with the big schools.

      • Joe

        Hi Bryan....I actually agree with your comment. However, we now have an AD that is quoted as saying 9-3 won't cut it and not playing for championships is not acceptable.

        I personally have no issue with reestablishing our regional schedule and rivalries. It certainly was alot more fun to watch.

        Take care,

        Joe