Garrett Cullen/MetroNews

University football coach John Kelley is against expanding the summer practice session.

MORGANTOWN, W.Va. – Many coaches are in favor, others not so much – that’s been the initial response to this week’s vote by the West Virginia Secondary School Activities Commission to expand the summer practice session to all but one week on the summer months.

The rule, which still has to be approved by the state board of education, would go into effect for the 2015-2016 school year. Part of the intent of the change would give coaches at each school more flexibility to get practices in, as opposed to the current three-week window.

Watch: WVSSAC’s Gary Ray discusses summer practice rule

“I hope the state board will pass this,” said Martinsburg boys basketball coach Dave Rogers. “I just hope they look at it in a positive light. You have coaches out there that have to do it the right way and not demand that those players be there all summer – I don’t think that was the intent of the rule.”

University football coach John Kelley, however, is one of those against the potential change.

“I’m opposed to it – I don’t think it’s the best thing for the kids,” Kelley said. “I don’t think it’s an educationally sound decision and I think they’ll see the ramifications of it down the road. They’ll argue that it will produce more scholarship athletes from the state, which I think is a ridiculous argument.”

With AAU basketball continuing to become more prevalent, many athletes are already consumed with practices and games during the summer months.

“They’re going to argue that it’s better the (high school coaches) coach them rather than AAU coaches,” Kelley said. “It’s a basketball driven proposal and a basketball driven situation. The kids need some time away from school. They need some time away from sports. They need to be kids and grow and develop in some things other than sports and I hope this thing is shot down by the state board of education.”

Morgantown football coach John Bowers doesn’t anticipate making any drastic changes to how his summer practices would go (from the current three-week window).

“The potential for abuse is there and the potential of making kids hate football is there,” Bowers said. “What they’re trying to do is combat the AAU faction of coaches, particularly in basketball – that’s my assumption. Maybe once a week in July we’ll throw it around a little bit, but the rest of the time just work in the weight room and on conditioning. But you have to take the football away a little bit, so that when practice starts, they’re actually ready to play the game.”

At Wheeling Central, boys basketball coach Mel Stephens doesn’t expect to add that many practices with the change, but sees the move as a positive, simply for scheduling purposes with other sports in the summer.

“For small schools, I think it would help,” Stephens said. “With the three-week period, if you have kids who are doing multiple sports, they have to make a choice of what one they want to do during that period. How much we would use it? I don’t really know. But I think it would be a good thing to eliminate packing everything into those three weeks.”

It’s that scheduling flexibility that continues to come up as a positive – something Rogers said could be utilized, if done the right way.

Christopher C. Davis/Clark’s Artistic Photography

Martinsburg boys basketball coach Dave Rogers is one of the coaches for expanding summer practices.

“I do not want to coach my kids all summer – I don’t want that,” Rogers said. “But I would like the opportunity to coach them in the summer league or take them to summer camps. If some of the players would want to come in to an open gym to shoot or have some personal coaching, it would give us the opportunity to do that.”

Morgantown girls basketball coach Jason White agrees and is another one of those coaches for the rule change.

“I just don’t think that coaches are going to bring kids in every single day and not ask for some type of compensation for it by coaching three months in the summer,” said Morgantown girls basketball coach Jason White. “I do see coaches maybe using a few more days here and there – but I see it as more of a training tool and an opportunity to go compete against other schools in shootouts or tournaments rather than coming in and drilling the kids over and over.

“Another factor that a lot of people don’t think about is that some of these kids are paying big time money to go be a part of an AAU team or a travel team – you’re talking about parents paying in upwards of $1,000 for that to happen,” White continued. “Not everyone can afford that – so to open that open and know that they have a coach that’s qualified to instruct their children, maybe that will save some parents money and travel.”

The state board of education will put all of the SSAC rules changes on its agenda for May. After a 30-day public comment period, the board will likely vote in July whether to approve the changes.

bubble graphic

10

bubble graphic

Comments

  • trey

    we should listen to Allen......i would say this is the Allen that coaches the Poca Dots........so i can see why he would think this way.

  • 1smartone

    This only really affects football. BTW....they aren't going to pay the coaches any more money for coaching. Why would they want to work all of their time off for no pay?

  • JimJim

    Push out AAU, I'm the coach, no one else. I'm the high school coach. Colleges should look to me for their players, not the AAU summer league. You must respect ME.

  • richard

    i agree with Allen. No doubt, this is a fall driven proposal. I don't believe they have thought this through.

  • Shadow

    Has anyone asked the kids? Seems to me they should have a say.

    • Why

      I am not sure why people always ask about the kids opinion. It would be nice to get their opinion but what do they know? I believe that is the reason why things are getting out of control in our society. When did children start knowing best?

  • Allen Osborne

    I disagree that this is a basketball driven proposal. If it was a basketball driven proposal, the practice would be year round. It is definitely a proposal driven by football and fall sports. With the school year starting earlier , this will give fall coaches time to prepare their athletes for their season. As far as AAU is concerned , the reason kids playing AAU is to be seen by college coaches. The live period for college coaches is in July. The good basketball players and those who play travel ball will unfortunately continue to do so. This is a very dangerous rule that really needs to be analyzed further.

    • Leon

      Allen: Really , Really??? You don't think it's a basketball driven proposal. Duh .... Look at who proposed it and yee shall find otherwise.

  • herman

    They should of passed it all year like Kentucky's rule. Gives the kids an open avenue to compete and coaches a chance to coach and doesnt just use up all their summer.

    • Epahandle

      Herman you are exactly correct