CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Promises of more transparency in the state Supreme Court budget is a step in the right direction, House Finance Committee Chairman Eric Nelson said.
Nelson (R-Kanawha) was a guest Monday on MetroNews “Talkline” following Friday’s appearance before the House Finance Committee by state Supreme Court Chief Justice Allen Loughry.
Loughry promised more openness when it comes to the Court’s budget. All of this following the recent spending controversy that included lavishing spending on office furnishings for the justices.
Nelson said he takes Loughry at his word.
“I personally have a much better feel but the proof is always in the pudding when we see some of this and we have not received that to date,” Nelson said.
The state court system’s budget, overseen by the state Supreme Court, is $141 million this budget year. Loughry is proposing a $139 million budget for next fiscal year. Nelson said he’s glad to see the reduction but isn’t sure if that will be enough to convince lawmakers from reacting to the spending controversy.
“I don’t think any level of overall expenditure drop will overcome the concern and the upsetness of everyone,” Nelson said.
Nelson describes himself as “being in the camp” of those who support a constitutional amendment that would bring the Court’s spending under the legislature like all other state agencies. He said he’s not sure if there’s a consensus among lawmakers.
“I do not know, but there has been greater discussion amongst members, not just Republicans, but all members about the need of transparency from the judicial branch,” Nelson said.
During his Friday appearance, Loughry asked the finance committee not to favor a constitutional amendment.
“I would just ask that you take a moment and consider the big picture,” Loughry said. “Our constitutional structure is carefully thought out.”
Loughry is scheduled to appear before the Senate Finance Committee Tuesday.