CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Twelve jurors are about to begin deliberating the controversy that has occupied West Virginia politics for the past year.

At 10 a.m. Wednesday, the jury of 10 women and 2 men from southern West Virginia will hear closing arguments in the trial of Supreme Court Justice Allen Loughry.

Federal prosecutors will have about an hour to make their final pitch to jurors about why Loughry should be convicted on the 22 counts he faces.

Then Loughry’s defense will have an hour to tell the jury, one more time, why the case against Loughry doesn’t come together.

“You still have a lot to do in the case,” U.S. District Judge John Copenhaver told jurors as he dismissed them Tuesday afternoon.

This point has come, as multiple witnesses testified, because Loughry himself called federal investigators to urge them to look into the financial policies of the Supreme Court. Instead, the situation turned on Loughry, as investigators zeroed in on the justice’s own practices.

The controversy surrounding Loughry has had a major impact on West Virginia politics. Loughry also faces significant prison time for the charges.

Most of the counts allege that he used a state vehicle and state-issued gasoline card for personal travel. Two more are fraud counts that he drove the state vehicle to conferences but also accepted travel cost reimbursement.

One is a witness tampering count, alleging he tried to coach Supreme Court employee Kim Ellis into a statement about the cost of his office renovation, knowing a federal investigation was possible.

And two more counts have to do with an antique “Cass Gilbert” desk in Loughry’s home.

One alleges he made a false statement about the whereabouts of the desk to an FBI agent, and another alleges he instructed Supreme Court spokeswoman Jennifer Bundy to issue a false statement to media about a home office policy for justices.

Three additional counts — all having to do with the antique desk — were dropped just as the trial began.

The trial has lasted a week already. A full day of jury selection was required last Tuesday to find 12 jurors plus two alternates who expressed an open mind, despite a year of media attention on Loughry.

Federal prosecutors called a range of witnesses — some to provide expertise on the travel records and cell tower data that composed the backbone of the case.

Others, like Ellis, Bundy and former Supreme Court Justice Brent Benjamin described not only the ins and outs of how the court functions, but also their interactions with Loughry.

Finally, the defense called Loughry himself, who wound up disputing almost everybody else’s testimony over the course of his own six hours on the witness stand.

Loughry’s defense called him to the witness stand on Monday afternoon, and he testified for three hours. Loughry testified for another three hours on Tuesday morning.

On Tuesday morning, Loughry responded to detailed questioning by U.S. Attorney Philip Wright, who discussed specifics about Loughry’s travel records and invoices from his book sales.

Wright focused at one point on a Jan. 19, 2014, gas purchase that occurred on a Sunday evening before Martin Luther King Jr. Day. Wright asked, “So you were conducting official court business at 8:17 p.m. on a Sunday of a holiday weekend?”

Loughry responded, “Well, it would require more official explanation if you would like me to do that.”

Referring to a March 23, 2014, gasoline purchase, Wright asked, “You were conducting official business in Kanawha County at 8:58 p.m. on a Sunday evening that required 12.636 gallons of gasoline?”

Loughry responded, “I could explain that if you’d like me to.”

Wright did not accept that offer.

Questioned later by his own attorney, John Carr, Loughry did explain some of his habits.

“Would you always fill the car up before you took it back?” Carr asked.

“I would, yes,” Loughry responded.

Carr also asked again for Loughry to explain some of the reasons behind his travel that had been questioned earlier.

In one instance, a trip to Morgantown, Loughry said he had been heading for a conference in Clarksburg when he got word that his mother had been taken to the hospital. So he diverted to Morgantown to see her.

In another instance, Loughry acknowledged stopping by the wedding for the owner of the company that published his political ethics book. But he said he was also in Tucker County for festivities and a parade in which he had been offered an honorary role.

Prosecutor Wright asked Loughry some questions about a limited liability corporation in the name of Loughry’s wife, Kelly. That company received payments from The Greenbrier Resort for Loughry’s book at $24.49 a copy.

Wright asked Loughry if his joint income tax filing reflected those payments. “You did not list any income or payment from The Greenbrier to your joint checking account?” Wright asked.

Wright also asked Loughry why there was no indication of such payments on the financial report justices file with the Supreme Court to reflect outside sources of income.

None of the counts against Loughry directly reflect allegations about payments for the books, although some of the charges having to do with Loughry’s travel result from his trips to The Greenbrier for book signing events.

Wright also ran Loughry through a timeline of some key events on the Supreme Court.

On Oct. 18, 2017, WCHS-TV reporter Kennie Bass sent a Freedom of Information request to the court, asking for information about the expense of renovations.

The next day, Oct. 19, Supreme Court employee Kim Ellis was summoned into a meeting that included Loughry, then-Administrator Gary Johnson, court financial officer Sue Racer-Troy and the top two in-house lawyers for the Supreme Court.

Ellis testified last week that she believed her job might be on the line, so she recorded the meeting. Loughry can be heard asking her if she remembered him saying his office renovation costs should come in lower than those for justices Menis Ketchum and Margaret Workman.

That conversation has resulted in a witness tampering charge against Loughry.

The day after that, Oct. 20, the ball really got rolling.

“You picked up the phone and called then-U.S. Attorney Carol Casto,” Wright said.

“That is correct,” Loughry concurred.

There was another few days that Wright went over, too.

In mid-February, Loughry testified in response to Wright’s questions, the rest of the Supreme Court became aware of a subpoena from federal investigators.

It turned out that was actually the second subpoena the court had received. The existence of the first subpoena then became known to other justices.

“Some of them became very angry,” Wright said.

Loughry responded, “Yes, sir, very angry.”

On Feb. 15, 2018, Loughry testified that he called FBI Agent Jim Lafferty. From the witness stand, Loughry recalled that he told Lafferty that Justice Workman “might have done something wrong in connection with a will.”

The next day, Feb. 16, the Supreme Court announced that Loughry had been voted out as chief justice. Workman was the new chief justice.

The vote among justices was 4-1.

“Who was the one?” Wright asked.

Loughry responded, “That would be me.”

Use a Facebook account to add a comment, subject to Facebook's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

bubble graphic

bubble graphic
Comments