How West Virginia Let Early Covid Success Slip Away

Just two months ago, it seemed West Virginia had the Covid-19 virus licked.  The number of current active cases dropped below 1,000.  Hospitalizations for the virus were down to a couple dozen.

Unfortunately, the good news was temporary.

The rate of vaccinations dried up just as the new Delta variant was moving into West Virginia.  Now cases are spiking again.  Hospitalizations are heading toward 600 while the number of current active cases has surged to over 16,000.

The death toll is up to 3,074.

Many West Virginia hospitals now require employees to get vaccinated as a condition of employment.  Public schools are struggling with mask policies, while attempting to keep children in school and avoid chaotic remote instruction.

Sadly, much of this could have been avoided if more West Virginians had been willing to get vaccinated.  As of Monday, 59 percent of West Virginians 12+ have received at least one dose, and the number is only slowly inching up.

No vaccine is 100 percent effective, so there are breakthrough cases.  DHHR figures show there have been 1,975 deaths since the start of the vaccine effort in West Virginia, but only four percent of the deaths have been breakthrough cases.

The unvaccinated account for most of the hospitalizations in West Virginia.  WVU Medicine, the largest health care provider in the state, reports 90 percent of its Covid patients have not gotten the shot.

Despite the statistics and the repeated assurances that the vaccine is safe and effective, tens of thousands of West Virginians refuse to get vaccinated.  One of the common refrains is that choosing not to get vaccinated is a matter of personal freedom.  “My body, my choice.”

The “freedom” issue is more complicated than that.  Robert Levy, chairman of the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, poses the question: “If the vaccine causes no appreciable injury, can you still refuse to be injected, notwithstanding that you might be visiting significant risks on others?”

His answer is that in the midst of a health emergency, “narrowly-tailored, time-limited rules” requiring vaccines may be justified because the actions (or in this case inaction) by an individual may affect others.

“Even those who resist government intervention in private matters will endorse rules that bar some persons from violating the rights of others,” Levy wrote.

That is the salient point since, as the CDC states, “Vaccines are playing a crucial role in limiting the spread of the virus and minimizing severe disease.  Low vaccination coverage in many communities is driving the current rapid surge in cases involving the Delta variant, which also increases the chances that even more concerning variants could emerge.”

When the vaccines first came out, tens of thousands of West Virginians stepped up to distribute and receive vaccines.  We were a great success story… for a while.  Now, six months later, we are our own worst enemy.

 

 

 





More Hoppy's Commentary

Hoppy's Commentary
Republican Voter Rolls Continue to Grow
April 23, 2024 - 12:44 am
Hoppy's Commentary
Jim Justice jumps on the Moore Capito campaign. How much does it help?
April 21, 2024 - 12:15 am
Hoppy's Commentary
Another tragic abuse and neglect case that raises familiar questions
April 19, 2024 - 12:26 am
Hoppy's Commentary
West Virginia's childcare desert
April 18, 2024 - 12:19 am


Your Comments